WSJ Reports OFCCP?s Methods to Identify Pay Discrimination Are Minimally Successful

March 15, 2016

This afternoon, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) released a major investigative report which found that the OFCCP’s aggressive tactics and demands for expansive data collection were only minimally successful in identifying pay discrimination. The WSJ report is significant because its findings suggest a fundamental disconnect between the OFCCP strategy for tackling pay discrimination and its overall results.


Although Congress increased OFCCP’s budget by almost $20 million over the past five years, over that same period OFCCP has collected less settlement money than it collected in 2004 alone. These meager numbers suggest “the agency has wasted resources tackling a problem that hardly exists.” Further, Congress has responded to the Agency’s performance by slashing OFCCP’s budget by $1.1 million and by refusing to provide for additional employees to serve as pay-analysis experts.


OFCCP’s Director Pat Shiu told WSJ that the low numbers were a direct result of her efforts to focus the agency on complex cases, such as systemic pay discrimination involving multiple workers rather than straightforward issues such as hiring.  New reporting rules issued under Director Shiu require contractors to submit a spreadsheet of all employees’ compensation.  WSJ reports that OFCCP critics and supporters agree that the agency lacks the statistical expertise to analyze contractor data so that audits that previously took six months now take two to three years.  Further, the numerous requests for data suggest the agency takes on “each audit assuming there is discrimination exists, if only they could find it.”


We will continue to follow this story but if you have questions, please contact your FortneyScott attorney.

April 29, 2026
Washington Legislative, Regulatory and Agency Update
April 29, 2026
SESSION 4: Worker Categories, the 5% Gap,  and Joint Assessments
April 29, 2026
New Enforcement Priorities at the Federal Agencies
April 29, 2026
AGC Labor & Employment Law Council's  Construction Labor Law Symposium
April 29, 2026
SESSION 6: The Future of Global Pay Equity and Transparency – Caring for Employees
April 29, 2026
Fireside Chat with EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas
Show More
April 29, 2026
Washington Legislative, Regulatory and Agency Update
April 29, 2026
SESSION 4: Worker Categories, the 5% Gap,  and Joint Assessments
April 29, 2026
New Enforcement Priorities at the Federal Agencies
April 29, 2026
AGC Labor & Employment Law Council's  Construction Labor Law Symposium
April 29, 2026
SESSION 6: The Future of Global Pay Equity and Transparency – Caring for Employees
April 29, 2026
Fireside Chat with EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas
April 29, 2026
SESSION 4: Worker Categories, the 5% Gap,  and Joint Assessments
April 28, 2026
AGC Culture, Inclusion & Belonging Roundtable - DEI Update
April 28, 2026
Federal contractors are facing immediate changes to implement stepped-up efforts to restrict DEI discrimination, including new mandatory contract clauses, expanded audits, and significant potential legal exposure. These far-reaching changes will impact prime contractors and all tiers of subcontractors. Any employer that is a federal contractor should immediately prepare for these new compliance obligations.
April 23, 2026
DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Standard In an effort to create a uniform, nationwide standard for determining joint employer status, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division will publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register on April 23, 2026. The proposed Joint Employer Rule aims to restore a standard similar to the more business-friendly Trump 1.0 rule. Specifically, the proposed rule clarifies when multiple organizations would be considered joint employers under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act. Comments are due within 60 days of the published date, or June 22, 2026. The proposed rule seeks to end nearly a decade of vacillating rules, as both the Trump and Biden administrations had tried promulgating a final rule previously. Those prior attempts created a series of conflicting executive and judicial rulings. As stated by acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling, this NPRM is intended to establish a “clear standard on joint employment.” Four-Factor Test The proposed rule modifies the Trump 1.0 standard, which focused heavily on requiring actual control by one company over another to establish joint employment. A prior judicial challenge to that approach was successful, requiring some modification to any new standard introduced thereafter. The proposed rule, therefore, responds by offering a four-factor test that is still heavily weighed on aspects of control. The four factors are whether a company: has the power to hire or fire a worker; supervises or controls a worker’s schedule or conditions of employment to a substantial degree; determines the rate and method of payment; and maintains a worker’s employment records. No single factor is dispositive, and the analysis will focus on the totality of the circumstances. Single National Standard Still a Goal The DOL acknowledged that some circuit courts continue to consider more factors and said the four listed factors were “not exhaustive.” Additionally, other federal agencies and several states have their own joint employer standards, some of which are directed at specific industries. For instance, the NLRB finalized its joint employer rule in late February 2026, with a similarly aligned standard that has some variances from DOL’s proposed standard. A final rule is anticipated soon after the comment period closes. Once issued, the rule may be subject to judicial challenges from interested parties that previously opposed similar regulatory approaches. Contact your FortneyScott attorney for additional information on how to submit comments and/or prepare for its impact on your workforce.
More Posts