EEOC Substantially Revises Key Components of its COVID-19 Guidance
July 18, 2022
OVERVIEW: EEOC quietly revised its COVID -19 guidance on July 12, 2022. In its latest update the Commission clarifies its view on several important issues for employers, announcing that the agency will apply pre-pandemic interpretations of ADA and Sections 503 standards to COVID-19 viral screening testing of employees which had been relaxed in response to the pandemic. These changes impact how employers must respond to pandemic-related issues making it even more challenging for employers who are grappling with reopening offices in the midst of another surge.
EEOC Guidance on COVID-19 Guidance
EEOC issued technical assistance guidance to provide answers to questions that frequently arise in the workplace during a pandemic beginning in March 2020. Since that time, EEOC has periodically updated What You Should Know About COVID-19 and the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and Other EEO Laws in response to new and emerging legal issues.
Here are some key takeaways from EEOC’s most recent update:
Major Changes involve Testing
- Mandatory viral testing must meet the business necessity standard. EEOC had previously permitted employers to mandate COVID-19 viral testing as a screening measure, without requiring any additional showing. Due to changes in the pandemic EEOC will now apply its a pre-pandemic ADA standard that viral testing be job related and consistent with business necessity. Employer mandated viral testing will meet the “business necessity” standard, according to the revised guidance, so long as it is consistent with the guidance from the CDC, DFA or state/local public health authorities current at the time of testing. (EEOC Guidance A.6 and G.1)
- Employers are prohibited from requiring antibody testing. Employers cannot require their employees to undergo antibody testing as a condition to reenter the workplace. Based on the CDC guidance, EEOC reasons that since an antibody test may not show whether or not an employee has a current infection or is immune to infection employer mandated antibody testing cannot meet the “business necessity” standard. (EEOC Guidance A.7)
- Pre-employment screening must comply with existing ADA standards. Once an employer has made a conditional job offer it may screen job applicants for symptoms of COVID-19, so long as the employer screens all entering employees performing the same type of job. An employer may also screen all applicants at the pre-offer stage if the employer is screening everyone (employee, applicant, contractor or visitor) entering the worksite for COVID-19 before permitting entry. (EEOC Guidance C.1)
Return to Workplace Clarifications
- Pandemic may cause excusable delays employers’ reasonable accommodation process. EEOC had previously acknowledged that circumstances surrounding the pandemic may interfere with employers responding expeditiously to an employee’s request for accommodation. In the recent update, EEOC notes that evolving circumstances, including, an onslaught of reasonable accommodation requests following an employer’s announcement of a return to the office, can justify delays in reasonable accommodation process and encourages employers to find interim solutions to keep employees working. (EEOC Guidance D.17)
- Mandatory personal protective equipment & related infection control measures subject to reasonable accommodation. Employers are permitted to require workers to wear personal protective equipment and observe other infection control practices so long as they engage in the reasonable accommodation process with workers who requests reasonable accommodation due to disability or religious accommodation. (EEOC Guidance G.2)
- Examples of reasonable accommodations that may reduce direct threat. The guidance provides examples of reasonable accommodations that could be deployed during the pandemic in order to reduce the direct threat to the employee or others in the workplace including enhanced protective gowns, masks, or gloves. Additionally, employers should consider enhanced protective measures like HEPA filtration systems; erecting barriers between employee and others; telework or other modifications of work schedules. (EEOC Guidance G.5)
- Providing information about employers’ accommodation process to all employees. It is a best practice for employers to provide information on their reasonable accommodations process for disability and accommodations due to sincerely held religious beliefs prior to returning to the office (EEOC Guidance G.6) and to provide additional flexibility for older workers as the risk of severe illness from COVID-19 increases with age. (EEOC Guidance H.1)
Ability to Cancel Job Offers
- Limited circumstances in which a job offer may be lawfully rescinded. If a newly hired employee tests positive, has symptoms or has been exposed to COVID-19, an employer can rescind their job offer if they need the new employee to start immediately and that employee would be in close proximity to others, whether at the workplace or elsewhere. (EEOC Guidance C.4)
- Job offers may not be withdrawn because of concerns about increased risk. Employers may not postpone the start date or withdraw a job offer due to concerns that the individual is older, pregnant, or has an underlying medical condition that puts the individual at increased risk from COVID-19. (EEOC Guidance C.5)
EEOC Guidance Continues to Support Vaccinations
- Mandatory vaccinations are still acceptable. The guidance reiterates that employers are permitted to require that their employees be vaccinated and to require employees to provide documentation of their vaccination, subject to reasonable accommodation and confidentiality requirements. (EEOC Guidance K.1, 4, 5)
- No limit on employer incentives for voluntary vaccinations administered by unaffiliated health-care provider. Presumably in an effort to eliminate any ongoing confusion caused by the Commission’s continued delay in issuing a new Wellness rule, the guidance states clearly that there is no limit on the incentives (including both rewards and penalties) that an employer may provide to employees who voluntarily receive a COVID-19 vaccination, from a health care provider that is not affiliated with the employer. (EEOC Guidance K.16)
Next Steps
The updated Guidance requires employers to walk a fine line as they work on returning their workforces to the workplace. Feel free to reach out to any of the FortneyScott attorneys with questions.
The OFCCP has made available for public review proposed changes to the regulations under VEVRAA and Section 503 . It has also released a proposal to eliminate the regulations tied to Executive Order 11246. These proposed rules are expected to be officially published in the Federal Register tomorrow, initiating a 60-day period for public comment. The move to rescind the Executive Order 11246 regulations follows the recent revocation of that order through Executive Order 14173. Changes suggested for the VEVRAA regulations appear to be minimal and would not significantly alter compliance obligations for contractors. In contrast, the proposed updates to the Section 503 rules would eliminate the 7 percent utilization goal by job group and the requirement that applicants/employees self-identify as disabled while retaining the annual outreach and recruitment assessment. Final rules are not anticipated for several months, and in the meantime, the current VEVRAA and Section 503 regulations remain in effect. The proposed rules will be published in the Federal Register tomorrow : https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/current#regular-filing-federal-contract-compliance-programs-office
On Friday, June 27, 2025, OFCCP Director Catherine Eschbach issued a letter inviting federal contractors to voluntarily submit information to OFCCP detailing contractors’ efforts to “wind down compliance with the EO 11246 regulatory scheme and ensure full compliance with the Nation’s non-discrimination laws.” Join David Fortney, Liz Bradley and Nita Beecher at 1:00 pm ET on Thursday, July 10th as they analyze Director Eschbach’s letter and provide practical insights to assist federal contractors in deciding whether or how to respond to this request. Specifically, they will discuss: The authority of OFCCP to collect this information. How OFCCP might use the submitted data. Whether submissions are likely to be subject to FOIA. Potential implications for contractors who choose to submit or not to submit data. Practical recommendations for crafting an effective response. To register for this webinar, click here . For additional information, please visit FortneyScott’s website , including recent developments and FortneyScott’s webinars and podcasts .
On Friday, June 27, 2025, OFCCP Director Catherine Eschbach issued a letter inviting federal contractors to voluntarily share with OFCCP how they have implemented program changes under Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity . Participation is entirely at the contractor’s discretion, including the content and format of such information and contractors have 90 days from date of the letter, or until Sept 25, to submit info into contractor portal. Submission instructions are available on OFCCP’s Contractor Portal . Director Eschbach’s letter further encourages federal contractors to provide: Confirmation that they have reviewed their EO 11246 affirmative action efforts; An assessment of whether employment or recruitment practices require modification; and If so, a description of the changes made and the steps taken to modify those practices. The letter then provides a list of the type of employment practices federal contractors should consider providing, to include: Trainings, sponsorship programs, leadership development programs, educational funding, or other privileges of employment available only to employees of a certain race or sex; Placement goals based on race or sex; Ratings by diversity organizations that graded employers on factors designed to promote the rise of non-white, non-male employees; Using applicants’ or employees’ participation in race- or sex-related (internal or external) groups or organizations as a “plus factor” or proxy for race or sex in employment and hiring decisions; Tying executive compensation to meeting race- or sex-based hiring, promotion, retention, representation, or other employee-demographic-related goals; Mandating courses, orientation programs, or trainings designed to emphasize and focus on racial stereotypes; and Encouraging employees to make recruitment efforts to or employment referrals of certain candidates based on race or sex. Director Eschbach concludes by recommending federal contractors consult the recent technical guidance by EEOC on what constitutes unlawful discrimination at work. FortneyScott is reaching out to DOL officials for further information. In the meantime, FortneyScott is actively advising clients on how to respond to this voluntary request. If you have any questions, please reach out to your FortneyScott attorney.
Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity , requires federal contractors to certify that their DEI programs comply with federal anti-discrimination laws. While some prime contractors have attempted to “flow down” this certification requirement to subcontractors, EO 14173 does not mandate such action. At present, subcontractors are not obligated to accept these flowed-down provisions. Additionally, under Executive Order 14275, Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement , amendments to the FAR/DFARS are expected, though no formal proposals have been issued to date. FortneyScott is closely tracking these developments and continues to advise clients as guidance evolves. For further information, please contact your FortneyScott attorney.
Special guest, Victoria Lipnic , former EEOC Commissioner and Acting Chair who now is a Partner at Resolution Economics and leader of the firm’s Human Capital Strategy Group, joins FortneyScott attorneys, David Fortney and H. Juanita Beecher, to discuss the latest EEOC developments. Under the leadership of President Trump’s Acting Chair Andrea Lucas, the EEOC has been busy implementing the Administration’s agenda. This has included President Trump’s Executive Orders announcing forebearance on disparate impact enforcement, focusing on “Illegal DEI,” removing guidance and materials relating to gender identity, and focusing on religious discrimination, anti-Semitism, and anti-Christian bias. We also will discuss the status of the two announced nominations for EEOC commissioners and staffing of critical positions at the agency.
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has launched a new Opinion Letter Program , expanding its compliance assistance for workers, employers, and stakeholders seeking clarity on federal labor laws. This initiative enhances guidance on workplace legal requirements by providing official interpretations from five key enforcement agencies. FortneyScott has extensive experience securing opinion letters, and the Firm has successfully obtained significant DOL opinion letters in the past. What Employers Need to Know Through this program, employers can receive official written interpretations of labor laws as they apply to specific workplace situations. The following agencies will issue tailored guidance: Wage and Hour Division (WHD): Provides opinion letters on wage, hour, and employment law matters. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): Issues letters of interpretation on workplace safety regulations. Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA): Publishes advisory opinions and information letters on employee benefits compliance. Veterans’ Employment and Training Service (VETS): Releases opinion letters related to veteran employment laws. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA): Offers compliance assistance through the new MSHA Information Hub, featuring regulatory updates and training resources. Why It Matters Opinion letters provide clarity, consistency, and transparency in federal labor law enforcement. Employers can use them as reliable legal guidance to ensure adherence to wage, benefits, and safety requirements, reducing the risk of noncompliance and potential litigation. Deputy Secretary of Labor Keith Sonderling emphasized that “opinion letters are an important tool in ensuring workers and businesses alike have access to clear, practical guidance.” Next Steps for Employers To leverage this resource, employers can: Explore previously issued guidance . Contact your FortneyScott attorney should you need any assistance in submitting a request for an opinion letter or compliance guidance. This program presents a valuable opportunity for businesses to navigate complex employment laws with authoritative insights from federal agencies. Employers should consider requesting opinion letters when facing regulatory uncertainties to strengthen compliance efforts
The OFCCP has made available for public review proposed changes to the regulations under VEVRAA and Section 503 . It has also released a proposal to eliminate the regulations tied to Executive Order 11246. These proposed rules are expected to be officially published in the Federal Register tomorrow, initiating a 60-day period for public comment. The move to rescind the Executive Order 11246 regulations follows the recent revocation of that order through Executive Order 14173. Changes suggested for the VEVRAA regulations appear to be minimal and would not significantly alter compliance obligations for contractors. In contrast, the proposed updates to the Section 503 rules would eliminate the 7 percent utilization goal by job group and the requirement that applicants/employees self-identify as disabled while retaining the annual outreach and recruitment assessment. Final rules are not anticipated for several months, and in the meantime, the current VEVRAA and Section 503 regulations remain in effect. The proposed rules will be published in the Federal Register tomorrow : https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/current#regular-filing-federal-contract-compliance-programs-office
On Friday, June 27, 2025, OFCCP Director Catherine Eschbach issued a letter inviting federal contractors to voluntarily submit information to OFCCP detailing contractors’ efforts to “wind down compliance with the EO 11246 regulatory scheme and ensure full compliance with the Nation’s non-discrimination laws.” Join David Fortney, Liz Bradley and Nita Beecher at 1:00 pm ET on Thursday, July 10th as they analyze Director Eschbach’s letter and provide practical insights to assist federal contractors in deciding whether or how to respond to this request. Specifically, they will discuss: The authority of OFCCP to collect this information. How OFCCP might use the submitted data. Whether submissions are likely to be subject to FOIA. Potential implications for contractors who choose to submit or not to submit data. Practical recommendations for crafting an effective response. To register for this webinar, click here . For additional information, please visit FortneyScott’s website , including recent developments and FortneyScott’s webinars and podcasts .
On Friday, June 27, 2025, OFCCP Director Catherine Eschbach issued a letter inviting federal contractors to voluntarily share with OFCCP how they have implemented program changes under Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity . Participation is entirely at the contractor’s discretion, including the content and format of such information and contractors have 90 days from date of the letter, or until Sept 25, to submit info into contractor portal. Submission instructions are available on OFCCP’s Contractor Portal . Director Eschbach’s letter further encourages federal contractors to provide: Confirmation that they have reviewed their EO 11246 affirmative action efforts; An assessment of whether employment or recruitment practices require modification; and If so, a description of the changes made and the steps taken to modify those practices. The letter then provides a list of the type of employment practices federal contractors should consider providing, to include: Trainings, sponsorship programs, leadership development programs, educational funding, or other privileges of employment available only to employees of a certain race or sex; Placement goals based on race or sex; Ratings by diversity organizations that graded employers on factors designed to promote the rise of non-white, non-male employees; Using applicants’ or employees’ participation in race- or sex-related (internal or external) groups or organizations as a “plus factor” or proxy for race or sex in employment and hiring decisions; Tying executive compensation to meeting race- or sex-based hiring, promotion, retention, representation, or other employee-demographic-related goals; Mandating courses, orientation programs, or trainings designed to emphasize and focus on racial stereotypes; and Encouraging employees to make recruitment efforts to or employment referrals of certain candidates based on race or sex. Director Eschbach concludes by recommending federal contractors consult the recent technical guidance by EEOC on what constitutes unlawful discrimination at work. FortneyScott is reaching out to DOL officials for further information. In the meantime, FortneyScott is actively advising clients on how to respond to this voluntary request. If you have any questions, please reach out to your FortneyScott attorney.
Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity , requires federal contractors to certify that their DEI programs comply with federal anti-discrimination laws. While some prime contractors have attempted to “flow down” this certification requirement to subcontractors, EO 14173 does not mandate such action. At present, subcontractors are not obligated to accept these flowed-down provisions. Additionally, under Executive Order 14275, Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement , amendments to the FAR/DFARS are expected, though no formal proposals have been issued to date. FortneyScott is closely tracking these developments and continues to advise clients as guidance evolves. For further information, please contact your FortneyScott attorney.
Special guest, Victoria Lipnic , former EEOC Commissioner and Acting Chair who now is a Partner at Resolution Economics and leader of the firm’s Human Capital Strategy Group, joins FortneyScott attorneys, David Fortney and H. Juanita Beecher, to discuss the latest EEOC developments. Under the leadership of President Trump’s Acting Chair Andrea Lucas, the EEOC has been busy implementing the Administration’s agenda. This has included President Trump’s Executive Orders announcing forebearance on disparate impact enforcement, focusing on “Illegal DEI,” removing guidance and materials relating to gender identity, and focusing on religious discrimination, anti-Semitism, and anti-Christian bias. We also will discuss the status of the two announced nominations for EEOC commissioners and staffing of critical positions at the agency.
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has launched a new Opinion Letter Program , expanding its compliance assistance for workers, employers, and stakeholders seeking clarity on federal labor laws. This initiative enhances guidance on workplace legal requirements by providing official interpretations from five key enforcement agencies. FortneyScott has extensive experience securing opinion letters, and the Firm has successfully obtained significant DOL opinion letters in the past. What Employers Need to Know Through this program, employers can receive official written interpretations of labor laws as they apply to specific workplace situations. The following agencies will issue tailored guidance: Wage and Hour Division (WHD): Provides opinion letters on wage, hour, and employment law matters. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): Issues letters of interpretation on workplace safety regulations. Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA): Publishes advisory opinions and information letters on employee benefits compliance. Veterans’ Employment and Training Service (VETS): Releases opinion letters related to veteran employment laws. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA): Offers compliance assistance through the new MSHA Information Hub, featuring regulatory updates and training resources. Why It Matters Opinion letters provide clarity, consistency, and transparency in federal labor law enforcement. Employers can use them as reliable legal guidance to ensure adherence to wage, benefits, and safety requirements, reducing the risk of noncompliance and potential litigation. Deputy Secretary of Labor Keith Sonderling emphasized that “opinion letters are an important tool in ensuring workers and businesses alike have access to clear, practical guidance.” Next Steps for Employers To leverage this resource, employers can: Explore previously issued guidance . Contact your FortneyScott attorney should you need any assistance in submitting a request for an opinion letter or compliance guidance. This program presents a valuable opportunity for businesses to navigate complex employment laws with authoritative insights from federal agencies. Employers should consider requesting opinion letters when facing regulatory uncertainties to strengthen compliance efforts
On Thursday, June 5, 2025, from 2:00 to 3:00 p.m. ET, FortneyScott will host a webinar entitled, EEOC Update in Trump 2.0 . Join us for this practical, timely discussion designed to help HR professionals, in-house counsel, and business leaders navigate these challenging areas. As a special guest, Victoria Lipnic , former EEOC Commissioner and Acting Chair who now is a Partner at Resolution Economics and leader of the firm’s Human Capital Strategy Group, will join FortneyScott attorneys, David Fortney and H. Juanita Beecher, to discuss the latest EEOC developments. Under the leadership of President Trump’s Acting Chair Andrea Lucas, the EEOC has been busy implementing the Administration’s agenda. This has included President Trump’s Executive Orders announcing forebearance on disparate impact enforcement, focusing on “Illegal DEI,” removing guidance and materials relating to gender identity, and focusing on religious discrimination, anti-Semitism, and anti-Christian bias. We also will discuss the status of the two announced nominations for EEOC commissioners and staffing of critical positions at the agency. To register for this webinar, click here . For additional information, please visit FortneyScott’s website , including recent developments and FortneyScott’s webinars and podcasts .
On May 19, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new Civil Rights Fraud Initiative, which will utilize the False Claims Act (FCA) to investigate and, as appropriate, pursue claims against any recipient of federal funds that knowingly violates federal civil rights laws. Violations of the FCA can result in treble damages and significant penalties. Deputy US Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a memorandum instructing DOJ attorneys to file FCA claims against recipients of federal money if a recipient knowingly violates civil right laws and falsely certifies compliance with Title IV, Title VI, and Title IX of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964. The memorandum states that the FCA is also implicated whenever federal funding recipients and contractors certify compliance with civil rights laws while knowingly engaging in racist preferences, mandates, policies, programs and activities, including through diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs that assign benefits or burdens on race, ethnicity, or national origin. The memorandum provided the following example as violating the FCA: Accordingly, a university that accepts federal funds could violate the False Claims Act when it encourages antisemitism, refuses to protect Jewish students, allows men to intrude into women’s bathrooms, or requires women to compete against men in athletic competitions. The Initiative will utilize the FCA to investigate and pursue claims, and will be co-led by the DOJ’s Civil Division’s Fraud Section and the Civil Rights Division. Finally, the DOJ strongly encourages private parties “to protect the public interest by filing lawsuits and litigating claims” under the FCA—reminding the public that successful FCA claims will result in the reporting party receiving a share of the financial damages that are imposed again FCA violators. FortneyScott will continue to monitor these developments. If you have any questions, please reach out to your FortneyScott attorney.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) officially opened the 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 data collection portal today, May 20, 2025. All private employers with 100 or more employees and any federal contractors with 50 or more employees are required to file their EEO-1 Reports by June 24, 2025. On the EEOC website employers can find FAQs , instruction booklet , fact sheets , file specifications and more. In her message announcing the opening of the portal, Acting Chair Andrea Lucas reinforced the Trump Administration’s anti-DEI push, stating: I want to take this opportunity to remind you of your obligations under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 not to take any employment actions based on, or motivated in whole or in part by, any employee’s race, sex or other protected characteristics. She went on to say that there is no “diversity” exception to Title VII’s requirements and reminded employers that just because employers collect and report race and sex data does not justify using the data to treat employees differently based on protected characteristics. Acting Chair Lucas also noted that President Trump’s Executive Order on disparate impact directed all agencies, including EEOC, to deprioritize “disparate impact” enforcement. If you have any questions, please reach out to your FortneyScott attorney.
EEOC is expected to open the portal for submission of 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Report on May 20, 2025. On May 12, 2025, the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the proposed changes to the 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Report. The EEOC had submitted the revised 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Data Collection Instruction Booklet and justifications for the changes to OMB on April 15. The primary change for employers is the elimination of the report’s non-binary reporting option in response to President Trump’s Executive Order 14168, Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government . In addition, EEOC will no longer provide the “Notice of Failure to File” letter to employers with incomplete or unfiled EEO-1 Reports and updated the procedures for requesting an undue hardship. According to the EEOC’s 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Data Collection Instruction Booklet, employers will have a much shorter filing period to file their reports than in previous years as the portal will close on June 24, 2025 . With this significantly shorter filing period (which is nearly a month shorter than last year), employers should begin collecting their data as soon as possible. One additional note, although Executive Order 11246 was rescinded by President Trump on January 21, 2025, the Booklet notes that federal contractors with 50 or more employees will still be required to file EEO-1 Reports on their 2024 data. FortneyScott will provide an update as soon as EEOC officially announces the opening of the portal for submission of 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Reports. If you have any questions, please reach out to your FortneyScott attorney.
